Recent Blog Entries:
Wednesday, May 1 2013, 10:29 AM Monday, April 8 2013, 04:07 PM Friday, April 5 2013, 05:15 PM Friday, February 22 2013, 09:41 AM Sunday, February 17 2013, 04:41 PM Friday, February 15 2013, 09:17 PM Friday, February 8 2013, 11:06 AM Thursday, February 7 2013, 12:22 AM Sunday, January 27 2013, 06:38 PM Wednesday, January 23 2013, 09:44 PM
Blog Archive
Wednesday, May 1 2013, 10:29 AM Monday, April 8 2013, 04:07 PM Friday, April 5 2013, 05:15 PM Friday, February 22 2013, 09:41 AM Sunday, February 17 2013, 04:41 PM Friday, February 15 2013, 09:17 PM Friday, February 8 2013, 11:06 AM Thursday, February 7 2013, 12:22 AM Sunday, January 27 2013, 06:38 PM Wednesday, January 23 2013, 09:44 PM
Blog Archive
Praise for the
Milkweed Triptych
"A major talent... I can't wait to see more."
—George R. R. Martin
"Mad English warlocks battling twisted Nazi psychics? Yes please, thank you. Tregillis's debut has a white-knuckle plot, beautiful descriptions, and complex characters-- an unstoppable Vickers of a novel."
—Cory Doctorow on Bitter Seeds
"Ian Tregillis triumphantly concludes his astonishing, brilliant, pulse-pounding debut trilogy, The Milkweed Triptych."
—Cory Doctorow on Necessary Evil
"Tregillis' conclusion of the Milkweed Triptych is the pièce de résistance of the series. Necessary Evil is a perfect marriage of science fiction, fantasy and alternate history."
—RT Book Reviews (4.5 stars, Top Pick) on Necessary Evil
"Darkly fascinating…A thoroughly fascinating conclusion to an imaginative tour de force."
—Kirkus on Necessary Evil
"A cross between the devious, character-driven spy fiction of early John le Carré and the mad science fantasy of the X-Men... Despite the jaw-dropping backdrop and oblique plotting, the narrative is driven by character and personal circumstance...
Grim indeed, yet eloquent and utterly compelling."
Grim indeed, yet eloquent and utterly compelling."
—Kirkus on The Coldest War
"The characters come alive via [Tregillis's] imaginative dialogue and his storyline will keep readers spellbound and on the edge of their seats with an intense sci-fi/alternate history thriller plot."
—RT Book Reviews (4.5 stars, Top Pick) on The Coldest War
"Well-drawn characters and a feel for time and place make this an excellent journey into an alternate Britain."
—Library Journal on Bitter Seeds
"Engrossing... Tregillis ably mixes cold war paranoia with his mythology."
—Publishers Weekly on The Coldest War
Close
When Memes Coalesce
Recent Blog Entries:
The End: NECESSARY EVIL Is Out! - 5/1/2013, 10:29 AM Because I Haven't Posted About tDCS In A While - 4/8/2013, 04:07 PM Announcing the NECESSARY EVIL Signing Tour - 4/5/2013, 05:15 PM Nuclear Deterrence in a Blood Magic World - 2/22/2013, 09:41 AM Guest Post #2 at Charlie Stross's Blog - 2/17/2013, 04:41 PM Guest Post at Charlie Stross's Blog - 2/15/2013, 09:17 PM A Conversation with Charlie Stross - 2/8/2013, 11:06 AM NOW OUT in the UK: THE COLDEST WAR - 2/7/2013, 12:22 AM Clarion Is Accepting Applications for the Class of 2013 - 1/27/2013, 06:38 PM Holy Smokes! Cover Art for Something More Than Night - 1/23/2013, 09:44 PM
Show all blog entries
The End: NECESSARY EVIL Is Out! - 5/1/2013, 10:29 AM Because I Haven't Posted About tDCS In A While - 4/8/2013, 04:07 PM Announcing the NECESSARY EVIL Signing Tour - 4/5/2013, 05:15 PM Nuclear Deterrence in a Blood Magic World - 2/22/2013, 09:41 AM Guest Post #2 at Charlie Stross's Blog - 2/17/2013, 04:41 PM Guest Post at Charlie Stross's Blog - 2/15/2013, 09:17 PM A Conversation with Charlie Stross - 2/8/2013, 11:06 AM NOW OUT in the UK: THE COLDEST WAR - 2/7/2013, 12:22 AM Clarion Is Accepting Applications for the Class of 2013 - 1/27/2013, 06:38 PM Holy Smokes! Cover Art for Something More Than Night - 1/23/2013, 09:44 PM
Show all blog entries
Saturday, January 29 2011, 12:28 PM
The thing I like most about the latest Wondermark comic, aside from the fact that it's a spot-on description of internet fame, is the sly callout to Garfunkel and Oates.
The parody of internet fame—which is almost the same as internet meme-ification (that's my word but feel free to use it)—works all the more because it references a real-world internet meme at the same time. It makes me imagine internet memery (that's mine, too, but go ahead and use it; I'm a generous soul) is like some kind of vast, virtual ecology.
Larger memes absorb smaller ones. Internet memes compete for attention (clicks) and resources (bandwidth); they share genetic material (as evidenced by countless LoLcat spinoffs); the fittest memes reproduce through repostings, retweets, blog posts, and email links. It's a Darwinian system where selection pressure forces memes to mutate into more successful versions of themselves.
There will, eventually, be one SuperMeme that dominates the internet. Logic suggests that it will be self-aware, and that it will enslave us. Probably using pictures of cats.
Close Permalink
Comments (2)
untitled -
Scott Denning, Monday, January 31 2011, 12:50 AM
In the grand/bad old days, we worried about engineered nanos endlessly replicating and covering the planet in ankle-, ass-, lip-deep grey goo. Then several things became apparent: that such replication requires considerable power, that the nanos would be competing against organisms already evolved to compete for those same power resources, and that if the nanos somehow tapped into another power source -- say, chemical -- it would result in a heat bloom that would be apparent from satellites in time to be contained. So grey goo, black goo, or khaki goo are likely to be only localized threats.
But those are the energy considerations for self-replicating nanodevices. The energy source for meme replication is *us*, an adjunct of our normal mechanisms for trying to organize the perceived world into a form meaningful. They use our energy to replicate; if we consciously recognize this, we can re-direct the energy to memes of which we approve. It seems that we cannot turn off the meme machine, but we can pick and choose the memes which we want to foster.
So why do we foster such crappy memes? Partly because we do not understand the process. You say, "Larger memes absorb smaller ones", an interesting parallel with biology (do I hear "Osmos" music? ;) but I cannot say I completely agree. Is the success of a meme best measured in its depth or in its breadth? Its longevity? In its very survival in the face of evidence to the contrary?
A consciously fostered meme may supplant a parasitic one. This in itself is a meme which we need to spread. Unfortunately, internet-facilitated consensus reality supports the idea that information with the greatest number of copies, must be correct. Which supports the perception that mere scale of duplication is a valid measure of success.
Could a meme become self-aware? Challenge competitors for resources, protect itself? An interesting notion. But -- need it become self-aware? The replication is inherently mindless, or perhaps a better term is unconscious; memes use our minds to breed, so have no need to develop their own. If a meme became self-aware, would it despair at the new perception of the futility of its existence? "Growth for the sake of growth," said Edward Abbey, "is the ideology of the cancer cell." Could a meme survive realizing that it was a cancer?
Of course, that is precisely the dilemma that some people think our species is encountering...
In the grand/bad old days, we worried about engineered nanos endlessly replicating and covering the planet in ankle-, ass-, lip-deep grey goo. Then several things became apparent: that such replication requires considerable power, that the nanos would be competing against organisms already evolved to compete for those same power resources, and that if the nanos somehow tapped into another power source -- say, chemical -- it would result in a heat bloom that would be apparent from satellites in time to be contained. So grey goo, black goo, or khaki goo are likely to be only localized threats.
But those are the energy considerations for self-replicating nanodevices. The energy source for meme replication is *us*, an adjunct of our normal mechanisms for trying to organize the perceived world into a form meaningful. They use our energy to replicate; if we consciously recognize this, we can re-direct the energy to memes of which we approve. It seems that we cannot turn off the meme machine, but we can pick and choose the memes which we want to foster.
So why do we foster such crappy memes? Partly because we do not understand the process. You say, "Larger memes absorb smaller ones", an interesting parallel with biology (do I hear "Osmos" music? ;) but I cannot say I completely agree. Is the success of a meme best measured in its depth or in its breadth? Its longevity? In its very survival in the face of evidence to the contrary?
A consciously fostered meme may supplant a parasitic one. This in itself is a meme which we need to spread. Unfortunately, internet-facilitated consensus reality supports the idea that information with the greatest number of copies, must be correct. Which supports the perception that mere scale of duplication is a valid measure of success.
Could a meme become self-aware? Challenge competitors for resources, protect itself? An interesting notion. But -- need it become self-aware? The replication is inherently mindless, or perhaps a better term is unconscious; memes use our minds to breed, so have no need to develop their own. If a meme became self-aware, would it despair at the new perception of the futility of its existence? "Growth for the sake of growth," said Edward Abbey, "is the ideology of the cancer cell." Could a meme survive realizing that it was a cancer?
Of course, that is precisely the dilemma that some people think our species is encountering...
Re: untitled -
Ian, Tuesday, February 1 2011, 03:57 PM
You, sir, have blown my mind.
Perhaps we're safe from full-blown grey goo scenarios at least until the nanites evolve to the point where they can convert energy directly to mass, Andromeda Strain style. Then our nuclear final option will be our own downfall.
Is the success of a meme best measured in its depth or in its breadth? Its longevity? In its very survival in the face of evidence to the contrary?
That's the question, and a good one. Perhaps, just as living organisms are DNA's way of making more DNA, LOLcats are just a meme's way of making more memes. But as you point out, and I agree entirely, the DNA itself isn't self aware. It's just doing its own thing.
You, sir, have blown my mind.
Perhaps we're safe from full-blown grey goo scenarios at least until the nanites evolve to the point where they can convert energy directly to mass, Andromeda Strain style. Then our nuclear final option will be our own downfall.
Is the success of a meme best measured in its depth or in its breadth? Its longevity? In its very survival in the face of evidence to the contrary?
That's the question, and a good one. Perhaps, just as living organisms are DNA's way of making more DNA, LOLcats are just a meme's way of making more memes. But as you point out, and I agree entirely, the DNA itself isn't self aware. It's just doing its own thing.
Add Your Comment:
Unwalkers interview [English | French ]
Interview with Speculate! Podcast Interview with Adventures in SciFi Publishing
Ian Tregillis on the Sword and Laser Podcast
Ian Tregillis on John Scalzi's The Big Idea
Interview with Pat's Fantasy Hotlist
Interview with SFRevu
Interview with Mad Hatter Book Review
Interview with Apex Books
Interview at Literary Musings Interview with Pat's Fantasy Hotlist
An interview with the authors of Busted Flush at Pat's Fantasy Hotlist
Interview with Travis Heermann at The Write Line
9-way interview with the contributors to the Wild Cards novel Inside Straight at Pat's Fantasy Hotlist
Interview in the February, 2008 newsletter of the Online Writing Workshop for Science Fiction, Fantasy, and Horror
An extended interview with Ian Tregillis by Ty Franck, on www.wildcardsbooks.com.